Open your own LinkedIn right now. Not to edit it. Just look at it the way someone would who has never met you, has 200 tabs open, and is trying to get through a list before lunch.
That is the actual test. Not whether your profile is complete. Whether a stranger who owes you nothing finds a reason to keep going.
Most profiles do not give them one. They are complete and they are empty at the same time. Every field filled in, nothing on the page that would make anyone stop.
I said in the resume post that LinkedIn is its own beast and I would do it separately. This is that. If you are an engineer, your GitHub is the other half and it gets read by a different person, later, for different reasons.
Quick context on me
I have been a hiring manager and recruiter for over five years, mostly in tech, and I have hired people into Google, Meta, Apple, a lot of the big places. I have reviewed hundreds of thousands of applications and manually read over 100,000 resumes.
Which means I have done the thing I am about to describe thousands of times. Opened a profile, scanned it, and decided in a few seconds whether to keep going. I am not guessing at what the other side does. I am telling you what I did all day.
What actually happens when someone opens you
Nobody reads your profile. They scan it in a fixed order, and at every step there is a version of you that gets the tab closed.
Look at where that ends. The whole thing is a funnel toward one click, and the click is the only step that turns a scan into a conversation. Everything above it is just earning the right to be clicked.
Most people have built a funnel with nothing at the bottom of it.
LinkedIn, top to bottom
The photo
A face, cropped tight, decent light. That is the entire requirement and it takes ten minutes with a phone and a window.
What does not work: the cropped group photo where your friend's shoulder is still in frame, the one from four years and one haircut ago, sunglasses, a wedding, anything where I cannot tell which person is you. Your photo renders at about 48 pixels in a search result. If your face does not survive that, the photo is doing nothing.
The banner
The default gradient is the single most wasted space on the internet. It is free real estate, everyone leaves it blank, and you can beat most of your competition in about five minutes.
Put one line on it. What you do, and where the work lives. That is it. Not a quote. Not a stock photo of a city skyline you have never been to.
The headline
This is the highest leverage line you own, because it follows you everywhere. Search results, comments, connection requests, the little preview when someone hovers your name. It is the one piece of you that shows up in rooms you are not in.
And almost everybody spends it on their job title, which LinkedIn already displays right underneath. You just paid for the same information twice.
Same rule as the resume. The actual thing, and what changed.
Notice none of those are clever. Clever is not the goal. Specific is the goal.
The About section
LinkedIn cuts this off after about two lines and puts a "see more" link under it. Almost nobody clicks it.
So whatever is below that fold does not exist. Write the two lines that do exist and stop worrying about the rest. Same three lines as your resume summary: what you do, what you have built, what you are looking for.
If your first sentence contains the word passionate, delete the sentence. Everyone can tell it means nothing.
Experience
People fill this in with their job description. The literal text of what they were hired to do.
Read it back and ask what it tells someone that the title did not. Usually nothing. "Responsible for developing and maintaining backend services" is the same sentence for four thousand people.
It is the same fix as the resume. The actual thing you built, a verb that says you built it, and what changed because of it. If a bullet would be true for anyone with your title, it is not doing any work.
Featured
This is the section that matters most and the one almost nobody uses.
Featured is the only place on LinkedIn where you can put your actual work above the fold, with a thumbnail, where someone can click it without leaving the page they are on. Your site. Your best project. The repo. The case study. The thing you shipped.
Go look at yours. If it is empty, you have built the entire funnel and left the bottom of it blank, and every scan that reaches the end of your profile just stops there.
Being findable at all
Everything above assumes someone already landed on you. Getting found is a different problem.
Recruiters search LinkedIn with the same words that are in the job description. If you have done the work but you describe it in words nobody searches, you are invisible to the exact people hiring for exactly what you do. Same trap as the resume: "AI/ML experience" filters nothing, "agent harnesses, tool calling, eval harnesses" is a thing someone types into a search box.
Connections matter more than people think, and not for the reason they think. It is not a vanity number. It is that most recruiter search results are ordered with your network in the picture, so the closer you are to the people hiring in your field, the more often you appear at all. Connect with people in the roles and companies you want. Not to pitch them. Just to exist inside the graph they search.
Your Name
Software Engineer at Northwind
San Francisco Bay Area · 500+
About
Passionate and results-driven software engineer with a proven track record of delivering high-quality solutions in fast-paced environments. Strong team player who thrives on… see more
Experience
Software Engineer, Northwind
Responsible for developing and maintaining backend services. Collaborated with cross-functional teams. Participated in code reviews and agile ceremonies.
Featured
Nothing featured
- 1Default banner. The one piece of real estate LinkedIn gives you for free, left blank.
- 2A cropped group photo. If I cannot see your face at 48 pixels, the photo is doing nothing.
- 3The headline is your job title, which LinkedIn already shows underneath. It spends your best line saying nothing new.
- 4About opens with a paragraph about passion. The two lines that show before the fold are the two lines you wasted.
- 5The role reads like the job description it was copied from. No scope, no ownership, no number.
- 6No links anywhere. The scan has nowhere to go, so it ends.
Search infrastructure. Work at yourname.com
Your Name
I build search that stays fast at 4M listings. Rebuilt ranking at Northwind, p95 900ms to 210ms.
San Francisco Bay Area · 500+
About
Backend engineer, 5 years, mostly search and payments. I own the ranking service behind a 4M-listing marketplace and the payouts service every transaction runs through.
Experience
Software Engineer, Northwind · 2023 to now
Rebuilt the search ranking service, p95 900ms to 210ms, clickthrough up 18%. Built payouts, 40k a month on Postgres.
Featured
Ledger, open-source double-entry library, 1.2k stars · A live transit map for my city, 4k monthly riders
- 1Banner does one job: says what you do and where the work lives.
- 2A face, cropped tight, lit well. That is the entire requirement.
- 3Headline says the thing you own and the proof, not the title.
- 4First two lines of About carry the whole pitch, because they are the only two that render.
- 5Same rule as the resume: the actual thing, a verb that owns it, and what changed.
- 6The link is the point of the profile. Everything above it exists to earn the click.
What closes the tab
These are the ones where I stopped reading, and none of them are about whether the person was any good.
- A blurry, cropped, or four-year-old photo
- The default banner, untouched
- A headline that just repeats your job title
- An About section that opens with the word passionate
- Experience bullets copied out of the job description
- Nothing in Featured, and no link anywhere on the profile
- A wall of endorsements for skills nobody asked about
- Six months of reposted engagement bait and nothing you made
- A profile that contradicts your resume on dates or titles
That last one gets people more than they realize. I have your resume open in one tab and your profile in the other. If the dates do not match I am not going to assume it was a typo. I am going to wonder what else is off.
Make the three of them one funnel
Your resume, your LinkedIn, and your GitHub are not three chores. They are one path, and the path only works if each step hands off to the next.
The resume gets you looked up. LinkedIn is where they look you up, and its job is to survive the scan and produce a click. The click lands on your work. The work is what they actually talk about when they call you.
So make sure the links exist and go somewhere. The resume carries your site and your GitHub. LinkedIn carries the same links in Featured, not buried in a contact panel nobody opens. Your site links the projects. Every one of those handoffs is a place people currently drop the chain, and a broken chain means the scan ends at the most polished version of nothing.
And use tracking links, so you know which of those steps is actually working. If nobody ever opens the link, the problem is the profile. If they open it and leave in ten seconds, the problem is what they landed on. You cannot fix a funnel you cannot see, which is the whole argument of running your search as a loop.
Yara keeps the same body of work presented per company and tells you who opened what. Slight plug, and the last one.
Do this tonight
None of this takes a week. Most of it is an hour, and it is the highest return hour in your whole search because it applies to every role at once instead of one application at a time.
- Replace the photo with a tight, well-lit crop of your face.
- Put one line on the banner. What you do, where the work lives.
- Rewrite the headline so it says the thing you own and the proof, not your title.
- Rewrite the first two lines of About. Nothing below them counts.
- Fix your current role's bullets the way you fixed your resume.
- Put your best work in Featured. It is probably empty.
- Check your profile against your resume for dates and titles that disagree.
The one question
Open your profile and ask: if I had never met me, is there one thing on this page I would click?
Not a list of places you have worked. One thing that makes a stranger curious enough to spend another thirty seconds on you.
If there is nothing, that is not a confidence problem or a market problem. It is a page you have not finished. Go finish it.
The resume is the other half of this, and it is the half that has to survive the parser first. Run yours through the free check, then come back and fix the profile.
Check your resume, freeFrequently asked questions
Does the Open to Work banner help or hurt?
There is no evidence it hurts. Every "it looks desperate" claim traces back to recruiter opinion in an article, never to measurement. The only numbers come from LinkedIn itself, which says the setting makes you twice as likely to get a recruiter message, and that is observational: people who switch it on are actively looking, which drives outreach on its own. Worth knowing there are two different things here. The green photo frame is public and everyone sees it. The recruiters-only setting is private. If the banner makes you uncomfortable, use the private one and lose nothing that matters.
How long do recruiters spend on a LinkedIn profile?
Nobody knows, and any post that gives you a number is recycling a resume study. The famous 7.4 seconds is about resumes, from a company that sold resume rewrites and never published its sample size. The only eye-tracking work that ever touched LinkedIn profiles was thirty recruiters in 2012, run by a company selling a competing profile product, which concluded its own profiles beat LinkedIn's. It never published a seconds-per-profile figure at all. Treat the scan as fast and shallow, because it is, but do not trust anyone quoting you a decimal.
How do recruiters find you on LinkedIn?
By searching the words in the job description, then filtering by title, location, company, and skills. Which means the words on your profile decide whether you appear at all, before any of the advice about photos and headlines applies. Write the specific terms someone would actually type. Your network matters here too: results surface people closer to the searcher first, so being connected to people in your field makes you appear more often.
Should I put my GitHub on my LinkedIn and my resume?
Yes to both, if there is something on it. Put it in Featured on LinkedIn rather than buried in the contact panel, and in the header of your resume next to your site. If your GitHub is empty or all coursework, fix that before you link it, because an empty profile is worse than no link. What to put on it is a whole post of its own. The rule from the resume post holds either way: if a link does not argue that you can do the work, it argues against you.
Why is my LinkedIn profile not showing up in searches?
Usually because the words recruiters search are not on it, not because anything is blocking you. Check the obvious settings first, that your profile is public and your headline and Experience sections are filled in, then check the language. If you describe your work in internal company vocabulary or in categories like "AI/ML experience" instead of the specific things you built, you will not match the search that would have found you.
Does the LinkedIn profile picture really matter?
Yes, but not for the reason the stats claim. LinkedIn says a photo gets you "up to 21x more profile views," which is a 2017 marketing line with no sample size and an obvious confound: active users both upload photos and get more traffic. The real reason is simpler. In a list of 300 results you are a 48-pixel circle and a line of text, and a blurry or cropped photo is a small signal that you do not sweat details.
How many LinkedIn connections should I have?
Fewer than you think. The 500+ threshold is a vanity milestone, not a filter anyone screens on. What matters is who, not how many: being connected to people in the roles, companies, and function you are targeting is what puts you in front of the right searches and gives you a warm path in. A thousand connections in an unrelated industry does nothing.
Should I be posting on LinkedIn to get hired?
Only if you have something real to say, which is a much higher bar than the feed suggests. One analysis of 5,000 long-form LinkedIn posts from July 2026 classified 81% of them as likely AI-written, and that is from a company selling AI detection, so read it as directional rather than exact. Either way the feed is full of generated sameness, and adding to it does nothing for you. Something you actually built, posted once, outperforms three months of engagement bait.